Category: Grain

WASDE the matter now?

An exciting week in markets, with volatility across equities and currency. In the past week wheat futures have performed well, but has the benefit been passed onto local growers? Overnight the WASDE was released, and it provides some data that is good for Australian grain in the long term.

The WASDE report was released overnight. The report was largely bereft of much in the way of surprises, with tinkering around the edges. The summary of the report is provided in table 1. On a month on month basis, the end stocks for wheat, corn and oilseeds were all reduced. This has to be tempered by the fact that season on season, end stocks are still strongly up, with the exception of corn.

An interesting piece of data in the report, was the imports of wheat. Egypt has traditionally been the largest importer of wheat; this year Indonesia is expected to take the crown. As we can see in figure 1, there has been a rapid increase in imports in the past five years. Increased Indonesian imports are of benefit to Australian farmers, as we have a geographic advantage into this destination. The question remains on whether imports have been higher due to low pricing, or whether this will continue to be a long-term trend when prices rise.

The futures market overnight took a tumble (figure 2), nonetheless futures when converted into A$ remain $15 higher than the same time last week. At a local level the full benefit of the futures rally has not been passed onto local growers, with basis levels (figure 3) falling between $5 and $11 dependent upon zone.

One thing to keep in mind is that although basis levels have fallen since harvest, they have fallen from close to record levels. In our articles prior to harvest, we recommended selling basis, as it was very top heavy.

I recommend re-reading the article ‘3 elements that need to be considered when selling grain’, this will gives some indication on how we can improve our risk management strategies.

 

What does it mean/next week?:

The A$ is currently falling, which if it continues this trend will add additional value to export pricing, and make it more attractive to buy in Australia.

The key focus will be on the US weather, with drought seemingly spreading further their productive potential will be constrained, if no rain is received in the next six weeks.

 

A review of the past month.

Time flows like water down the river rapids, we are now into February and the holiday season is now but a distant memory. January has come to an end, and it’s worth examining how the start of the year has gone.

The futures market has risen sharply in the past three weeks (figure 1), this has been as a result of a depreciating US dollar (discussed here) and weather concerns. The market is concerned about weather patterns in the US (see map), which show abnormally dry conditions across much of the country. Although still early in the season, the speculative short in the market as at close to record levels, which can lead to sudden swings in the market. Time will tell whether the weather risks, are enough to warrant a sustained rally or whether the large global stocks are enough to constrain pricing.

The A$ has been like a steamroller since the beginning of December (figure 2), with 81¢ being achieved last week. Whilst there has been

a modest fall, it has remained stubbornly above 80¢. The RBA have their first meeting of the year next week, and it is expected by most that rate will remain at current levels (1.5%). However, currency analysts are having divergent views on when rates will rise, with the following forecasts:

  • ANZ forecast two rises in 2018, with the first possible in Q2
  • Credit Suisse believe that there is the potential for a rate cut in 2018
  • UBS forecast no rate hike in 2018
  • Morgan Stanley forecast no rate hike in 2018, but a rise in 2019

I was asked this week why local prices have not moved in line with futures. The futures prices have rallied, at the same time as the A$. This takes some shine off when converting to a local value. However, the basis level has slid downwards since harvest. It has to be remembered that basis levels are still very strong, and technically we are actually receiving very strong prices compared to the rest of the world.

In recent months, we have discussed the reality of high basis prices and provided some advice on ways to lock in basis through a physical sale, and keeping exposure to the futures market. Those who followed this advice, have now benefitted from locking in a historically strong premium, and can now also benefit from futures rises.

I recommend reading the following article on, which briefly explains a number of strategies:

How to defer grain pricing

What does it mean/next week?:

As always at this time of year the market will be looking towards the weather, what does it have in store for the northern hemisphere crop. It is currently a balancing act between potential depleted production in 18/19 against record global stocks.

The RBA interest rate announcement will be made, it is likely to remain the unchanged and remain at record low levels.

 

Do more mouths equal more money?

Key Points

  • Real prices of wheat have fallen drastically since the 1970’s, whilst population has drastically risen.
  • Farmers around the world have increase production to meet demand, without utilizing more land. The increases have been because of yield improvements.
  • Since the 1970’s the world has produced around 100kg of wheat per person.

It’s a statement heard regularly for the past century, the world is growing and it will need to eat. The logic is that with more mouths, there will be more demand. As demand rises, then prices should follow. However, in grain that doesn’t seem to be the case, why is that?

A couple of weeks ago, I was contemplating the price of wheat versus the rise in global population over the past decades. I ended up with figure 1, this shows the real price of wheat (in 2012 prices) against the world population. It is clear that in real terms prices have fallen substantially, at the same time that the population has risen.

It is logical to assume that demand has increased, as the world grows. However, there must be a reason behind the lack of upward movement in pricing. Let’s take a look at production, and what has occurred in the same period.

In figure 2, global wheat acreage and production is displayed. As we can see acreage, has largely remained within a narrow band. We can however see that production has drastically increased in the same period, if it’s not through land increases, it’s obviously yield.

In figure 3, the population and yield are presented. Since the early 60’s to present yields have drastically increased. The average yields in the 1960s was 1.2mt/ha, this decade it is 3.2mt/ha. An astronomical increase brought about through technology, agronomy and management practices.  When we compare population and yield, they both run in a very tight parallel as can be seen in the linear trendline.

To further demonstrate our ability to produce wheat on a very large scale, the generative capacity per population is shown. This is the amount of wheat available per person, if shared equally on an annual basis. After a strong increase in yields during the 1960s, the world has continued to provide an average of 100kg’s of wheat per person.

Clearly, human society has been able to advance wheat yields to keep in line with population, at an almost step for step change. This has been because of farmers adopting farming practices which enable them to produce larger crops. However, by meeting demand, has this resulted in a constrain in prices?

What does it mean/next week?:

The world population is expected to follow a linear path until it reaches between 9bn by 2050, and as high as 12bn in 2100. The world will be required to produce a global average yield of 4.3mt/ha to maintain a 100kg’s per person productive capacity.

Is this possible? Well there are still vast tracks of land in the world that are still unproductive, which could bump up yields. There is a lot of buzz around agtech, will new precision ag technologies allow for improve production and efficiencies?

Prices do not always equal profitability, as an efficient farmer with low prices will be more profitable than an inefficient farmer with high prices.

The question is, is higher production the best solution for farmers?. Although production increases will help societies prosper through lower malnutrition, will it provide increases in price?

The opposing views of the white house

The week has overall ended up positive for grain producers in Australia. The market has been largely driven by noises from the white house, which seem to have very opposing views on the future of their economy. In this weeks comment, we take a look at the descent of the Chicago futures, and the strong ascent of the Australian dollar.

The futures market has regained some traction in the past week, with Chicago spot futures up 4% since the 19th Jan. There are some concerns about weather in the northern hemisphere, but the increase in futures has largely come from weakness in the US Dollar. In figure 1, the spot Chicago futures are shown in both US¢/bu and A$/mt.

The fall in the US$, and the subsequent rise in A$ has led to the increase in A$ wheat swaps being weaker, albeit still reasonable at 3% week on week.

The US$, has been weakening in the past fortnight due to mixed signals from the US administration. The US secretary of state, had made comments pointing towards a weaker US$ being positive for the economy. This sentiment points to the likelihood of limited interest rate rises in the coming year. However, President Trump provided a conflicting view that the dollar will be stronger, and that was the aim of the government.

In figure 2, the US dollar index (DXY) is plotted. The DXY is an index based on a trade weighted basked of currencies against the US$. In recent weeks, the greenback has declined to it’s lowest point since December 2014.

This weakness has flowed through to the A$, which has gained ground to close above 81¢ (figure 3). The improving value of the A$, contributes to making local export commodities less competitive on the world stage, however in theory imports should be cheaper.

The current rise in the A$ is largely as a result of US weakness, and with the unknowns of the political machinations of the white house, we could be in for a rocky period of time. If the market regains confidence in President Trump’s claims of a stronger dollar, we could see a decline in the A$.

What does it mean/next week?:
The market continues to look towards the northern hemisphere. We are currently experiencing La Nina conditions which can lead to a drier than normal conditions in the US, this is starting to be seen.

We are still a long way from the finish line when it comes to the US crop, but signs are point towards relatively poor conditions, and with low planting figures any issue can be exacerbated.

Wheat and Bitcoin.

The markets have been very quiet over the past week, with little in the way of new information to get the trade excited. Usually in our Friday comments, we would take a look at the past week. This week, I thought I would take a quick review of the past two years.

In figure 1, the Chicago spot wheat futures, converted to A$ has been plotted. The past two years has not been pretty, the average price in this period has been a meagre A$211/mt. The futures price makes up the bulk of our price in Australia, we have a very low floor with which our local premiums can contribute to.

The basis is our premium or discount between the physical and futures market, and typically we compare Australian prices to Chicago futures, but it can be against any other pricing point. Basis is important as it can help substantially to increase the prices that we receive locally.

In figure 2, we can see the basis between APW1 and Chicago futures. As we can see, for the bulk of the past two years levels have been at a premium, with a short period of time where SA has experienced negative levels.

This season we can see that basis levels have been extremely strong since seeding. This is due to the weather risk, and then the realization that the Australian crop was going to end up below average. This basis has helped push up localphysical prices to provide a much stronger return for growers.

What is important to remember is that basis levels are largely driven by supply (or lack of), and if Australia had produced an ample harvest, then our basis levels would have been much lower, in combination with a period of low futures prices.

You would have to be living under a rock, if you hadn’t heard about the stratospheric rise of bitcoin. Although of little analytical benefit, I thought this was quite interesting to look over time at how many tonnes of wheat that you can buy for 1 bitcoin. This is displayed in figure 3, in mid-December a bitcoin could get you 122mt on the Chicago futures market, today it will get you 73mt.

What does it mean/next week?:

The market is likely to be quite dull in the coming weeks. There now seems to be less concern about the northern hemisphere crop, and every week that flows without an issue removes risk.

It sounds bad, but we need a supply issue to our fellow farmers in the north. We can’t rely too heavily on basis to make us profitable.

Defer grain pricing: More than one way to skin a cat.

At this time of year, those lucky to have grain on hand will now be deciding whether it is best to sell their grain or hold on for higher prices. There are many ways of deferring pricing, and give exposure to the market at a later date. This short article will provide summaries of easily accessible options.

Storing to sell

Exposure: Basis & Futures

The obvious option for deferring pricing is to hold onto your grain and sell at a later date. This can be carried out either through central storage or through your own on-farm storage system.

Key considerations:

  • Remember to calculate your storage costs and interest charges if storing in the system, this amount has to be recouped to make it worthwhile.
  • Place a realistic price on your time, capital, fumigation and interest when storing on farm.
  • Whether your on-farm storage is in a good enough condition to make it to the targeted sales timeframe.

No Price Established contract (NPE)

Exposure: Basis & Futures

 The NPE contract comes under a number of different product names through different providers, however all perform the same function. The purpose of the contract is to provide traders access to grain, when the grower doesn’t like the price. The grower is then given a predetermined timeframe in which to secure their price.

Key considerations:

  • Check what the product fee is.
  • Is there an advance?
  • Check how the pricing is established. What is the methodology if the trader is lower than the market?
  • Do not use an NPE if the contract is only based on the trader’s price.
  • Maintain a close eye, and remember that it is a time-based contract.
  • Check whether storage and handling fees still apply.

More in depth information:
http://blog.mecardo.com.au/grain-canola-npe-contracts-the-simple-facts

Cash and Call

Exposure: Futures

The cash and call strategy involves the use of derivatives, but is not particularly complicated (guide on link below), and can be transacted through most banks or through a broker. The cash and call strategy is suitable when basis levels are strong, and futures are low. At its simplest, the grower sells his physical grain and then takes out a call option, which provides a benefit if the futures market increases in value.

The call option works in a similar way to an insurance, where the grower has a known worst-case scenario, in exchange for paying a premium.

In the Cash and Call strategy, the grower has a known cost (Premium) and for this cost has exposure to future favourable price increases. If the market price of the Call Option does not increase, only the Premium is lost.

Key considerations:

  • Is the market structure favouring removing basis exposure, whilst retaining futures potential?
  • Does your bank have the capacity to offer these instruments?
  • There are no further storage costs in this strategy.
  • The market has to climb higher than the premium to provide a positive pay-off.
  • The premium will change dependent upon time, and strike price.
  • There are some pool providers offering managed products which are based solely on the cash and call strategy.

 

More details:
http://blog.mecardo.com.au/i-dont-like-the-grain-price-but-i-need-the-cash

 

Buying a swap/futures contract

Exposure: Futures

The traditional method of utilizing a swap, would be to sell a swap prior to harvest to lock in a futures price, and then unwind the swap by buying back the swap from the bank at or near harvest. Although not common practice amongst farmers, it is possible to buy a swap/future contract.

It is possible with many banks to turn it around and instead of selling a wheat swap, buy a wheat swap. Let’s say for instance the current basis levels were high, and futures were low. It would be possible to sell your physical grain and lock in the basis, at the same time as buying a wheat swap.

The buying of the swap would give an exposure to the futures market. Therefore, if the futures market rallied you would participate in any upside. In an ideal world you would then close out your swap position when you had reached your target price, and with the addition of the basis already captured, would be your overall price.

Key considerations:

  • Is the market structure favouring removing basis exposure, whilst retaining futures potential?
  • There are no further storage costs in this strategy.
  • Some banks will not allow a grower to buy a swap, and those that do will likely want to see a physical sale contract. This is to ensure that the instrument is being used as a hedge and not for speculative activity.
  • A direct futures contract with the exchange will be cheaper but has the potential for margin calls.
  • Should the market fall further after the swap is taken this strategy has the possibility of loss, further eroding the final overall price.

More details:

http://www.mecardo.com.au/commodities/analysis/turn-grain-swaps-around.aspx

Pools

Exposure: Dependent on pool strategy

Prior to 2008, wheat pools were the primary marketing route for the Australian growers. This has changed dramatically and <30% would be expected to be marketed through managed programs. The breadth of providers and products has however ballooned to fight over the remaining pool participants.

At its most basic, the pool is a product where growers provide a manager with tonnage with the expectation that they will manage this to provide a better return than they could achieve themselves. Typically, an unpriced scheme or product would be considered a financial product and require an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), however an exemption for grain pool has been extended by ASIC.

What to keep in mind when selecting a pool:

  • Does the pool strategy meet your requirements and your own view of the market?
  • Do you think the pool provider has the experience to operate the pool?
  • Does the pool provider have an AFSL? This gives an indication that the provider must take compliance extremely seriously.
  • What are the payment schemes, and how do they work with your taxation and cash flow requirements?
  • Pool providers put together some flash marketing, ignore this.
  • Check past history, but remember that past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

The dollar discount.

It must be hard being a currency forecaster, because they rarely seem to get it right. In this weeks grain market commentary we take a look at futures, currency and basis.

The futures market has provided somewhat of a price recovery since the middle of December, when the spot contract switched to the March delivery. In figure 1, I have produced a fancy animation to show both the futures in ¢/bu and A$/mt. The futures contract has made a steady rise (up %), however when converted into A$, we can see that prices have largely gone sideways.

This lack of upward movement is because of an appreciating Australian dollar, this can be seen in figure 2. This has been caused by the recent release of bearish US CPI figures, pointing to the delay of interest rate hikes there, and some stronger economic data out of Australia in the form of improved employment figures and robust retail spending in the lead up to Xmas.

Basis levels have stayed relatively stable during the first two weeks of January, however basis remains on a tight balance. Will a strong finish to sorghum drop feed grain demand, or will the ABS downgrade to the 16/17 crop and resulting fall in carry give a floor to pricing?

Please note this comment was produced last night, and will not consider any changes overnight.

Next week

The WASDE report will be due overnight, along with US planting numbers. It is doubtful that we will see much to sway the markets, but I will keep an eye and if anything interesting comes up, I will report on Tuesday.

New year, new opportunities.

Dawn has broken on 2018. The start of a new year brings fresh possibilities, and a few positive signals have started to appear in the market. In the zodiac calendar 2018 is the year of the dog, let’s hope that its wrong and we are in the year of the wheat bull.

So far in 2018 the wheat futures market has shown some positive signs. In US¢/bu. Chicago futures (figure 1) have gained 3% since boxing day, although the A$ has removed most of the shine from the rise. The market is currently starting to price in weather risk into the US winter wheat crop, after a series of cold weather events is likely to have caused some damage since inadequate snow cover was in place.

These weather events come on the back of a USDA crop progress which is particularly bullish (figure 2). This chart shows the current percentage of the crop rated as good to excellent. As we can see, with the exception of Colorado, all states are showing substantial year on year reductions in the good to excellent category. It has to be taken into account that this rating was determined prior to the cold snap, and it is liable to be downgraded further.

At a local level, after relatively lacklustre grower selling throughout, harvest sales were more forthcoming between Christmas and New Year. This increased selling pace has led to a depreciation in basis levels (versus Chicago). In figure 3, we can see the extent of the fall in basis since just prior to Christmas, which was largely inevitable and was discussed in following articles:

Lock in premiums, keep exposure to the market

Wheat seasonality: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

Let’s look back at historical basis

It remains to be seen whether basis levels will improve as the festive season draws to a close. At present most businesses are still operating at relatively low levels, with many not returning until the 8th January.

Next Week

The market will continue to examine weather risks due to cold and la nina in the northern hemisphere. I don’t expect big jumps in the coming week with the exception of potentially speculatively driving rallies.

It will be interesting to see the direction that basis takes this week; will grower selling pace result in further falls or will more buyers come to the table and drive it north?

Do they know it’s Christmas?

We are just on the brink of silly season, where the majority of the western world will effectively stop. There will be skeleton staff in most organisations (including Mecardo), and there will likely be little new activity. In this week’s comment, we have a look to see if the market has provided any pre-break cheer and joy.

This week saw the end of trade in the December 2017 CBOT futures contract, and we thought it was worthwhile highlighting the performance of this contract. In figure 1, we can see the price from the start of trading in July 2015 to present. Apart from some northern hemisphere jumps mid-year in both 2016 & 2017 the market has been on a downward tradgetory.

In Australian dollars the December contract closed at $188, $90 below the peak achieved in July 2017. Growers who participated in a swap at this level, will be rewarded with a substantial return due to the swap profit and strong basis levels.

The Australian dollar regained strength this week (figure 2), on the back of stronger than expected jobs data. The Fed reserve also increased rates however have pointed to three rate rises in the coming year, a more gradual increase than expected.

The USDA released their December WASDE, which was as expected. The December report typically offers little in the way of surprises and is largely an adjustment exercise. In reality, if you want an update on the December WASDE, just read about the November one (click here).

The report pointed towards continued high stocks (figure 3), which unless something goes wrong in the northern hemisphere will lead to continued depressed pricing. The USDA interestingly maintained production in Australia at 21.5mmt, which will have to be adjusted in future reports.

So overall, this week there hasn’t been much data to provide joy this Christmas, but all it takes is an issue in the north to get improvements in price.

Next week

An interesting place to keep an eye on is Ukraine, which has very cold weather approaching but with little in the way of snow cover.

The bear necessities.

A tough week in the grain market as the scaleof the global crop continues to bite hard. In this article, we will look at some recent WA forecast releases which paint a bearish tone.

Let’s start with the futures market. In figure 1, we can see the futures market since the beginning of October, and it’s not been particularly pretty. In the past week Chicago spot futures have dropped 5%, or 20.5¢/bu/A$9.6/mt. In Australia, producers have been cushioned from these falls through strong basis levels (thepremium or discount to futures).

The bulk of the fall can be attributed to StatsCan releasing more bearish data which is dragging the market down. The Canadian government forecaster increased well above expectations the size of the wheat crop to just a tick under 30mmt.

On Tuesday ABARES released their December crop estimates (read analysis here), which unsurprisingly pointed towards an overall decline in production year on year, and against a range of averages. Yesterday the respected Grain Industry Association of WA (GIWA) released their December update. The GIWA group utilise a group of industrycommentators and agronomists to develop their estimates of the crop, which is updated monthly compared to ABARES quarterly report.

Western Australia had a poor start to the season, however had a very good finish. In mid-year, the crop in Kwinana and Geraldton was in a very poor condition and it seems like a miracle to see the crop coming to fruition.

The WA crop expected is now expected to reach the following levels:

  • Wheat – 7,375,000mt
  • Barley – 3,399,000mt
  • Canola – 1,770,000mt

In our update on the ABARES numbers, we commented that the WA canola crop had already exceeded forecasts. This is further highlighted by the GIWA forecasts, which are in line with what is happening on the ground. Interestingly, the extent of the development of the canola crop has been a surprise to many including GIWA, with a 33% increase since last months forecasts!

In table 1, we have summarised the wheat, barley and canola to give an indication on the zone by zone basis.

What does this mean?

The USDA will release the December WASDE, this report will further cement the scale of the global crop, but will largely be bereft of any major surprises that the trade has not already factored in.

As we get closer to Christmas, can we expect to see any surprises presents from traders as they pay up to accumulate before the long Christmas break?