Tag: Grain

A look locally and globally

The market continues to follow a similar pattern to recent weeks. In this week’s comment, we look at futures & basis levels. In addition, we look at where our main competitor (Russia) is pricing its wheat. 

When it comes to wheat markets, we are in the dead zone. A time when there is a lack of fresh data to give the market a strong direction. In figure 1, Chicago wheat futures are displayed in both A$/mt & US$/mt. In A$ terms the Dec futures are up $7/mt week on week, however remain $1.7 down since the start of the month. The fall in the A$ against the US$ has helped balance against the fall in futures, so the fall has not been as strong (figure 1).

Throughout October, we have been warning readers that basis levels were unlikely to be maintained at levels seen at the start of the month. In the past week, basis levels have continued to fall (figure 2). This in combination with the low futures levels, reduces the overall price available to growers. The analysis article yesterday “Swap update” delves into more detail on using swaps to gain full advantage of the market.

The Russian crop keeps going from strength to strength, with estimates >82mmt. As we all know Russian/Ukraine are now our biggest competitors on the export market, and it is of paramount important to keep an eye on them. In figure 3, we can see that in A$ terms Russian wheat has increased strongly in the past month. This is helpful for Australian growers, as it makes our wheat compete more effectively.

Next week

At a local level, Australia is weeks away from the start of harvest and that is where our focus should lie.

It is important to ensure that you have a plan in place, for marketing your grain. At present grower selling is very low, and this could lead to a degree of harvest pressure on pricing.

Keep an eye on the local market

The futures markets are largely quiet, as the northern hemisphere is largely complete for 2017 and seeding progresses for next year. At a local level, it is important to start considering local premiums and how to take advantage of them.

This time of year is always bereft of data to move markets, in this crop calendar (link), it is clear that the year is largely finished for the global wheat crop. The only majors remaining alongside Australia to harvest are Brazil and Argentina.

The lack of strong data, has left the market largely directionless. In figure 1, we can see that spot futures have trended downwards since December became the spot contract. Last night was the first this week to end the day in the green, albeit marginally. In good news, US export sales were up considerably week on week, which will help futures prices if maintained.

At a local level, harvest has begun in the north and it won’t be long until the bulk of farms around the country will be ‘reaping what they have sown’. During October, rainfall has been strong through much of northern NSW and QLD, although not adding much in the way of benefits to the winter crop has added confidence in the summer crop. This has resulted in consumers reducing some of their buying appetite, as they reassess the situation for the coming 6 months.

In recent weeks, prices around Australia have started to depreciate. In figure 2, the APW port price is shown for all zones. Over the past ten days prices have fallen 4% on the east coast and 2% in Kwinana. Basis levels have fallen in recent weeks, however remain at strong levels. The lack of grower selling, in combination with the fact that production & carryout will exceed requirements, increases the likelihood of falling prices/basis.

At these very high basis levels, and low futures prices it is worthwhile examining a long swap/reverse swap strategy which has been outlined in ‘Lock in premiums, keep exposure to the market’.

Next Week/What does this mean?

At present there are considerable premiums available for growers. As growers start to sell the crop, the logic would be for basis to fall.

In order to avoid this, it is worthwhile examining your potential production with a view to commencing your sales program (if not already). This can be carried out through flat price sales or in conjunction with a reverse swap.

 

 

 

ABARES tell us what we know USDA surprise

The Australian Bureau of Agricultural Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) made an interesting move this week, warning of crop downgrades.  Meanwhile the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) made their monthly predictions.

ABARES don’t often flag what they are going to say in their reports, but this yesterday they put out a release telling us what we already know.  Growing conditions have not been great in NSW, and there is likely to be some yield downgrades, but they also noted that recent rain may have saved some crops in the Riverina and Central cropping zones.

This news was picked up in international markets, but like here, it has been widely reported and didn’t have much impact on markets.

The World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) from the USDA did move the market however.  Figure 1 shows the changes from September, with the headline figures being the downgrade in Oilseed stocks, and the upgrade in wheat stocks.

The USDA predicted lower yields for soybean crops being harvested now, and this wiped half a million tonnes off US production.  The market was expecting an increase, and the report saw soybean prices jump 2.4% higher.  Unfortunately for Australian growers this didn’t really translate into higher prices, with ICE Canola up just $2 to $CA502.6/t for January 18.

Global wheat production was lifted 5.3mmt thanks to improving production in the EU and India.  The USDA did downgrade the Australian crop by 1mmt to 21.5mmt.  Figure 2 shows we are still well and truly on track for a record carryout for 17/18.

The week ahead

Wheat prices in Chicago lost a few cents last night, but the AUD was up so swaps will be a bit weaker today.  Domestic basis is driving most of the change in price at the moment, and recent rain has seen it weaken, especially in southern states.  Sellers will obviously be more confident of production now.

Historically October marks the seasonal low for corn and soybean prices, so we might find some support for international markets over the coming months, translating into better prices here.

An Indian Summer

Futures markets edged lower this week, but were balanced by a fall in the Aussie dollar. In this week’s comment, we look at rumours of increased import duties in India, and local premiums over Chicago futures.

The futures market lost strength over the past week, with a week on week change of 11.5¢/bu (figure 1) or approximately A$5.4/mt. There hasn’t been much in the way of fresh information in recent weeks to drastically move the markets.  The A$, has also fallen to 77¢, from 80¢ this time a month ago, provided some comfort to pricing.

There are rumours that India will increase import duties from 10% to 20-25% in the coming weeks. The Indian government are likely to introduce to an increased wheat import duty in order to encourage local producers to plant wheat, by making foreign wheat more expensive. India is very much an on-off importer (figure 2), and in recent years has become more important, however as we can see in figure 2, they often switch between an exporting and importing nation. It must be said that as the Indian economy grows, along with an expanding population that imports are liable to swell.

At a local level, we have seen some rain around the country. I am sceptical at this point that it will be beneficial in northern NSW & QLD, however will help the Victorian crop. At present basis levels continue to stay strong due to the domestic demand, and in Port Kembla premiums over Chicago futures continue to remain at historically high levels (figure 3). The question remains, how long will these premiums remain. In Australia around 8-9mmt of wheat is required domestically, even though this is a poor production year we will have more than enough to meet requirements especially when we consider carryover from last season.

There are very few growers who have forward sold for the coming harvest, it is advisable to consider selling a small parcel, as these levels are attractive. If it turns out to be the worst price you receive for the season, then it is still a good number.

Next Week/What does this mean?

The WASDE report is due on the 12th, however it is hard to see much in the way of surprises. I would expect Australia to be downgraded from 22.5mmt to 20-21mmt.

It is likely that an official announcement on wheat import duties into India will be announced in the next week.

Are we on the verge of a La Nina event?

The US Climate Prediction Centre, is currently on La Niña watch with an increased likelihood of the little sister to El Niño occurring before the end of the year, and into 2018. This can have very positive results for Australian grain growers, in this analysis we look at how we may benefit.

According to the BOM, ‘El Niño’s often lead to drier conditions over large parts of Australia, while La Niña’s tend to enhance rainfall over much of the continent’. However, it must be noted that not every drought is associated with El Niño nor every wet year with La Niña.

A visualisation of the impact can be viewed here.

In this analysis we have examined the El Niño and La Niña events which have been considered moderate to strong from 1960 to 2015 in order to determine what impact these events have on grain crops by analysing the year on year change in wheat production.

In figure 1, we see the year-on-year impact of El Niño split into east coast and west coast. In the period 1960-2015, 7 of 11 El Niño years have recorded a reduction in wheat production, with 6 of these years recording a > 20% reduction. In Western Australia the impact of El Niño has been less negative, with 6 out 11 event years recording an increase. However, only two of these years record > 20% increase. In addition, during the years of production decline, 3 of these years recorded large production falls of > 20%.

The year-on-year impact of La Niña is displayed on both the east and west coasts as highlighted in figure 2. In the period 1960-2015, there have been 8 La Niña events. The east coast during these La Niña events experienced 6 years where production has been higher, with 4 being >15% and 2 events where production reduced by >20%. The impact of La Niña in WA has caused 4 out of 8 years to have a production contraction, with 3 of those years having a >20% decline. The La Niña years with an increase in production in WA have resulted in smaller increases than the east coast with the exception of 1988.

In both figure 1 & 2, it is evident that since the mid 1980’s in Australia El Niño events have overall been negative for crop production and La Niña events have been positive, with the exception of 2010 in WA.

In figure 3, the year-on-year impact of La Niña & El Niño is detailed at a global level. During an El Niño year we can determine that production was reduced in 6 years out of 11, and increased in 5 years with no changes of more than 10% on a global level. During La Niña years, global production has increased in 3 out of 8 years, whilst production has decreased in 5 years.

At present, the market is not yet overly concerned with La Niña. However, it does have the potential to impact greatly on the US crop through drier weather and eastern Australia through wetter than average conditions. If La Niña starts to impact on the US crop production, then we are likely to see risk premiums emerge in US futures markets, which will flow on to our own prices.

Key points:

  • El Niño events tend to have a larger negative impact on east coast Australian production, with 6 out of 11 moderate to strong El Niño years recording >20% decrease.
  • La Niña events tend to result in increased production on the east coast, especially in events since the mid 1970’s which may be due to more efficient water use.
  • La Niña years in Western Australia tend to be more subdued with lower production gains, and a higher chance of reduced production.

What does this mean?
The market is looking for information to provide direction. The anxiety resulting from the potential for a La Niña can result in the formation of a risk premium in Chicago futures, as buyers seek to reduce risk from US related supply issues.

Australian growers would therefore benefit from a rise in futures prices.

No rain equals price gain

Local and international wheat markets continued to edge higher this week.  Local markets are still trying to get a grip on where the crop will end up, as it shrinks by the day.  The international market remains awash with wheat, but a rising rouble gave unlikely support.

Regular readers will be aware of the heavy wheat crop in Russia, and subsequent cheap exports emanating from the Black Sea.  This week those exports became a little dearer, as the Russian currency, the Rouble, rallied against the US dollar.

This helped lift CBOT wheat futures to a five week high, with the December contract gaining 8¢ for the week to get back to 452¢/bu last night (figure 1).  The Aussie dollar is not doing grain producers many favours, it’s stuck at 79US¢, putting December Swaps at $210/t in our terms.

Locally the dry spell in NSW continues to run down the potential crop, with prices responding accordingly.  ASX East Coast wheat, which we must remember is now deliverable in Victoria, was quoted at $283/t yesterday, up around $10 for the week.  Interestingly Geelong continued to lag a bit, although it was up around $14 for the week to $274/t (figure 2).

The more stricken zones of Newcastle and Port Kembla hit $321 (figure 2) and $316 respectively.  A good price but unfortunately there won’t be much wheat to deliver at these prices.

Barley prices are lagging significantly in the north, priced at $268 (Newcastle) and $250/t (Port Kembla), but in Victoria they are at a more normal spread, about $40 behind APW, at $240/t.

Canola values are also at a premium in the northern cropping zones, but not as much as you would think.  Newcastle Canola is priced around $550, with Geelong just $15 behind, at $535/t.  It’s hard to see much canola being produced in NSW, but there might have been enough carry over from last year to satisfy local crushers.

The week ahead

While it remains dry the question is how much more of a premium can local wheat markets get on Chicago.  In Port Kembla APW basis to CBOT broke through the $100/t mark this week.  The old ASX wheat contract, which was deliverable only in NSW (figure 3) only went higher than $100 premium to CBOT during the 2007/08 harvest.

An honest politician, lamb, cattle & GM Canola

Key points

  • The South Australian government are maintaining a ban on the cultivation of GM crops.
  • Non-GM canola in Kwinana receives a premium $30.7 on average over Adelaide.
  • Victoria livestock on average trades at a premium to SA: Lamb (3%) & Cattle (3.5%)

On Thursday, I will be presenting to the Crop Science Society of South Australia on the topic of GM crops, and the markets associated with them. I thought this was therefore an opportune time to look at the GM moratorium, and whether the promised premiums are available.

South Australia currently has a moratorium on the production of GM crops, such as Canola. In recent months, there have been further campaigns to allow croppers access to the same tools as the other major cropping areas. The Premier of South Australia, was quite honest and upfront regarding their position on maintaining a ban:

“The truth is there are not a lot of votes out there in country South Australia for us, so in some ways we are free of the electoral imperatives about this”. Jay Weatherill, 2017

In figure 1, the Canola price in Adelaide & Kwinana is plotted. As we can see from the start of 2012 to present, the WA crop tends to trade at a premium to SA. The average spread between Kwinana and Adelaide is A$30.7. This is a relatively simplistic viewpoint, as there are logistical benefits of shipping from WA. Nevertheless, this still points towards the GM ban providing a premium.

The South Australian government may point to a knock-on effect where other commodities are receiving a boost. In that case, we thought it was worthwhile checking how strong the premium for cattle and lamb had been due to being from a GM free state.

In figure 2 & 3, the trade steer and trade lamb for Victoria and South Australia are plotted. I have chosen Victoria as a comparison, as they operate in similar markets. As we can see over the course of time there is a premium in Victoria for both cattle (3.5%) & lamb (3%).

These highlight, albeit in a simplistic manner that mixed farmers in South Australia do not on average achieve a strong premium in either canola or livestock due to the ban on GM cultivation.

Next Week/What does this mean?

 

The South Australian ban on GM cultivation is providing little if no extra premium to prices of livestock and canola. There may be premiums in other sectors such as the seafood and wine industry, however this is of little comfort to canola producers.

At present the South Australian govern believes that GM crops could have negative impact on premiums. However, it is important not to assume, and it would be beneficial for an independent research piece to be conducted examining all factors and determining in full where the premiums are.

At present producers do not have access to all the tools to help manage their crops, and evidence has shown from around the world that GM and Non-GM crops can co-exist. If there are no premiums available to these growers, then they are effectively subsidising other food industries.

 


Half full or half empty. It depends on where you farm

The Australian east coast crop is a tale of two continents, with the bulk of NSW and QLD in a poor state, and Victoria/ East SA developing. The market is well and truly capturing the status of the crop, and the domestic market is pricing accordingly. This creates an issue of premiums being available (half full), but being unable to take advantage of them (half empty).

The futures market has been largely flat in spite of the release of the WASDE, the report had little in the way of surprises. The market has been trading in a narrow band between A$197 and A$205 for the past month (figure 1). The chart is a stark reminder of how quickly markets can move, with December swaps trading from a high of A$280 to a low of A$197 since the start of July.

In the early part of the week, I spent time in NSW and had discussions with a number of grain brokers and agronomists. The NSW story is turning into a horror, according to all reports the damage from frost and the lack of in-season rainfall has likely reduced the bulk of potential from the crop. We can see this reflected in the market with Port Kembla basis levels (figure 2) continuing to maintain at historically high levels.

If a grower in Port Kembla had taken out a swap during the height of the July rally, then their overall price today would be >$370, which shows the value in strategic marketing using derivatives.

At a flat price level, I have taken the pricing for Kwinana, Geelong and Port Kembla (figure 3). We can see that Geelong and Port Kembla have seen strong rallies during September, whereas Kwinana has remained relatively flat. This is due to the domestic demand, largely in NNSW & QLD pricing strong premiums. At present SNSW & NVIC are pricing into the feedlots in the North.

Next Week/What does this mean?

The problem with having a premium basis level at the moment, is that it is on the back of poor cropping conditions, and so while some will benefit, many will not have the production to participate in the current strong market.

In the next week will we see the speculators continue to view the market as bearish, or will we start to see additional profit taking?

Frost is a pain in the stem

For those into pop culture references, the term ‘Winter is coming’ has been prevalent in recent years. We are officially past winter now, but that hasn’t stopped the frost. Our friends in NSW just can’t seem to get a break this year.

The US were busy celebrating labor day on Monday, well at least those not bracing for (or recovering from) Hurricanes. The market had a strong recovery prior to the holiday, with short sellers taking profits after a continuous decline over the past month (figure 1), however over the past two sessions the market has lost around half of these gains. The market was not helped by the Food and Agriculture Organisation raising its expectations for the global cereals crop to 2.6bmt, which would be the highest on record.

The Australian crop has gone from bad to worse. NSW, which has struggled since seeding with a lack of moisture, has now been impacted by unusually severe frosts. The impact of a likely drop in supply has led prices to follow the theoretical logic of basis perfectly.

In the past week, we have witnessed basis levels increase dramatically (figure 2). In this data set it is most markedly so in Port Kembla, where the crops are likely to be most impacted.  The other zones on the east coast have also risen considerably, and flows are now likely from southern to northern areas.

In figure 3, the basis levels as a percentage of the overall price are plotted. As we can see, there have been considerable rises in all zones. The rise was far more sedate in Kwinana, which has for the past 8 weeks maintained at strong levels, and the bulk of issues in the WA crop have been priced in. The basis levels as a percentage of the price in Kwinana and Port Kembla are now at historically high levels.

 

Next Week/What does this mean?

We have a double whammy on Tuesday. The USDA and ABARES release their crop estimated for September.

There have been a number of issues in Australia, however I expect ABARES to take a relatively conservative approach to any drops in production.

The key will be the USDA report, will there be any surprises? The recent upgrades to the Russian crop will likely give a bearish edge to the report.

Dead calm in grain

In nautical terms, ‘Dead Calm’ is completely still sea, with the absence of wind or waves. The grain market could be considered to be in a period of dead calm, with the market waiting for some wind or waves in the form of substantial new data to blow us either way.

The futures market is relatively unchanged week on week (figure 1). The spot contract gained lost strength during the week falling to 400¢, before regaining to 410.25¢ (+0.75¢ w-o-w), whilst the December contract remained pretty much unchanged throughout the week. The reality of the Russian harvest continues to weigh on crops.

At a local level, the central NSW crop seems to be going from bad to worse, after experience moisture deficit over the past three months, they have been hit by particularly bad frosts (see map) with many agronomists fearing a stem frost, however the full impact will not be apparent for another week or so.

In contrast, Victoria seems to be the jewel in the crown and after having covered part of the state in recent days the crop looks to be in almost perfect condition, appearing to be on track for well above average yields.

The basis levels around the country (figure 2) have continued to remain at strong levels due to lack of grower selling. The question remains as to whether these levels will remain when harvest selling pressure arrives. Although, with likely diminishing yields overall in Australia, downside pressure will likely be capped.

 

Next Week/What does this mean?

It may be too early to say, but it seems that the market has found a floor based on current market dynamics.

In two weeks, we will have the September WASDE report released, along with the ABARES report. The question will be whether the trade has priced in any downgrade, or whether any likely downgrades will cause a stir.